IKEA and the USSR - which furniture is better

IKEA and the USSR - which furniture is better Furniture for the kitchen of the USSR or IKEA

It is impossible not to notice the fact how much the quality of modern furniture began to differ, and in particular, its service life. If the cabinet, which was made back in the days of our grandmothers, is able to maintain functionality even now, then modern models will begin to wear out already in the first 10 years after operation.

Let's look at the advantages of USSR furniture and why it is better than kitchens from IKEA.

A little about furniture of the times of the USSR

If we talk about the Soviet period of furniture production, then it will be fairly divided into two segments:

Pre-war a time when this branch of industry was not developed to such an extent that the choice was made in favor of those items that they managed to make back in the tsarist period. The only things that were done for the needs of citizens were armor-type beds and simple kitchen sets, which were represented by the simplest cabinets and stools.

The post-war period in which the state decided it was now time to think about the needs of the general population. In the period from 1950 to 1970, mass production of all types of furniture began, but it was made so low-quality, the appearance was simply terrible. Residents of the Baltic countries were the first to produce more or less decent headsets. Already in the 1950s and 1960s, it was possible to buy veneered cabinet cabinets, which are covered with a thick layer of varnish. While in Belarus, Ukraine and Russia they were still trying to "put together" something that only remotely resembled normal furniture.

And now let's take a closer look at everything related to Soviet furniture.

Soviet furniture

The development of this area of ‚Äč‚Äčindustry progressed extremely slowly, and this was due to the difficult economic situation. In any case, it has always been said that in the postwar years the country was greatly ruined. The state did not think about the fact that citizens should be comfortable, but only about how to provide them with the most necessary for life. Although, if you look at the same time at Germany in the post-war period, then they quickly recovered and very soon began to make high-quality goods in order to equip a house, and the pieces of furniture were not only beautiful, but also functional.

IKEA and the USSR - which furniture is better One of the most successful examples of the development of European production of interior elements was the IKEA firm, and namely most examples of kitchen furniture in the post-war period were written off from it. But if European manufacturers were distinguished by the high quality of the goods made, then from the point of view of both technology and aesthetics in the USSR, everything turned out miserable and even crooked - in terms of ergonomics and beauty of appearance.So, we suggest you take a closer look at the samples of furniture from the USSR - was it really so reliable and durable?

The so-called walls are cabinet furniture that took up a lot of space, and especially in Khrushchevs. It was made of very thick chipboard, and therefore all the doors were so heavy that they quickly began to warp due to their own weight. This was facilitated by low quality fittings.

The varnish chipped off very quickly, and then further destruction and delamination of the chipboard took place at the chip site. If you drop such a door on your feet, you could easily break both the first and the second. Despite the fact that the idea itself was borrowed from the Swedish and now very famous IKEA, the implementation lagged behind in terms of design and manufacturability.

Kitchen furniture from the USSR and so on were not very attractive, but there was nothing to do, and people bought what was.

  1. Folding tables.

    This is one of the "masterpieces" of Soviet production. As a rule, the legs loosened very quickly, which is why they had to be fixed afterwards with brackets and bolts, because otherwise the product could not be used. In addition, when folded, they remained as functional as possible.

  2. Kitchen sets. An unattractive design, low-quality chipboard even for that time - all this made the furniture very strange.

    Sometimes it was impossible to buy a full-fledged kitchen set just because the cabinets for the sink could be very different in appearance from the whole structure.

  3. Sofa-book. The main goal of this type of furniture was to save space in small rooms. But it was very uncomfortable to sleep on this one, moreover, for one person or two. This happened due to the fact that the design was incomplete, then that some parts had a slight slope towards the center.

    For this reason, those who were sleeping on the couch were constantly rolling down the middle of the couch. It was also extremely inconvenient to sit on it, because the depth of the product did not correspond to the anatomical features of the human body structure, and everything happened exactly in such a way that during the design the workers were very careless about the anatomical and ergonomic characteristics.

And now, as you can see from everything presented above, most of the problems started because of the appearance, as well as ease of use. But at the same time, the very quality of the materials from which the furniture was made showed very high results in terms of resistance to wear.

A little about IKEA

IKEA and the USSR - which furniture is better This company is known for offering inexpensive and practical solutions for home improvement , and kitchens from IKEA are no exception.

For the first time, headsets for kitchens saw the light of day back in 1963, and are still very popular. The price is affordable, the design is thoughtful, the quality is the hallmark. Still, such furniture is inferior in quality to furniture from the USSR.If you choose something from inexpensive products, then you should not place high hopes on quality, but as for more expensive lines ..

.

Sometimes they cost the same or even more expensive than custom-made high-quality furniture that is customized all the individual features of your kitchen. It is up to you to choose this brand or not, but I want to say that if you take a not the nicest cabinet from the USSR and the same unsympathetic one from IKEA, then after restoration (painting, selection of accessories), you will receive two beautiful cabinets at the exit. But the one that was produced in the territory of the former USSR will remain high-quality strong.

Why furniture made in the USSR serves for a long time, but modern furniture does not

But if we compare Soviet furniture with the one that was produced in the same period, then of course however, she lost very much to her foreign counterparts in terms of convenience, and this was due to the fact that abroad they paid much more attention to comfort.

If we compare the furniture of Soviet production with the one that was already created in the post-Soviet space, then you can notice a bias in the other direction. The appearance and performance of the products were better, but the quality made a big difference.

This is due to cybercriminals who work in this niche and want to get the maximum amount of profit with the minimum investment. But if you save on convenience and design, then this is an automatic loss in favor of competitors, therefore enterprises are trying to reduce the cost of products, and this is where the economy on quality occurs. This is not always noticeable immediately after purchase, but it will definitely manifest itself after a certain time interval, which is what manufacturers use.

In the modern world, it will not be profitable to make quality goods, because 10 years later you will not go for a new sofa, but will continue to sleep on a solid one.

Details in the video about IKEA furniture

.